Skip to content
Student Complaint Redressal Policy

Student Complaint Redressal Policy

Policy Title

Student Complaint Redressal Policy

Policy No.
AIU/RG/SA/CRP/2025
Effective Date: _________ 2025
Version: 1.0
Approved by: _______________
Authorized by: Registrar Office Team

Section 1: Short Title, Commencement, and Scope

1.1 Short Title

This policy shall be called the “Student Complaint Redressal Policy, 2025.”

1.2 Commencement

It shall come into force on and from 01 July 2025, upon approval by the competent authority.

1.3 Scope and Applicability

This policy applies to all enrolled students of Alhamd Islamic University, across all academic programs and campuses, with respect to grievances arising from academic matters.

This policy is framed under the powers conferred by the Alhamd Islamic University Act, 2005, particularly:

Section 4(0): which empowers the University to supervise and control the discipline of the university students,

Section 18(2)(d): which provides to regulate the conduct of discipline of students of the University, and

Section 23(1)(d): which empowers the statutory bodies to approve rules and policies to maintain academic discipline and integrity

Schedule 13(4)(a): which empowers the University to propose regulations to Academic Council for the conduct of University students, maintenance of discipline and dealing with cases of indiscipline.

2.2 Compliance with External Guidelines

This policy is aligned with:

HEC Grievance Redressal Guidelines (2022)

HEC Code of Conduct for HEIs (2020)

Section 4: Definitions

4.1 “University”

Means Alhamd Islamic University (AIU), including all its constituent campuses.

4.2 “Student”

Means any person enrolled in any undergraduate, graduate, or postgraduate program of the University.

4.3 “Complaint”

Means any formal expression of dissatisfaction made by a student concerning an academic matter.

4.4 “Redressal”

Means a formal process of addressing and resolving a complaint.

4.5 “Vice Chancellor”

Means the President of Alhamd Islamic University.

4.6 “Redressal Committee”

Means the institutional committee constituted under this policy to investigate and decide on complaints.

4.7 “Registrar”

Means the Registrar of the University or any designated officer acting on his behalf.

Section 5: Categories of Complaints

5.1 The following categories of complaints shall be entertained under this policy:

5.1.1 Course Delivery and Teaching Conduct

5.1.2 Examination, Assessment, and Result Issues

5.1.3 Registration and Enrollment Delays

5.1.4 Misconduct or Unprofessional Behavior by Academic Staff

5.1.5 Academic Document Errors or Delays (e.g., transcript, degree)

5.1.6 Violations of the Academic Calendar or Course Guidelines

Section 6: Principles of Redressal

6.1 Right to Representation

Every student shall have the right to lodge a grievance without fear of prejudice or retaliation.

6.2 Timely Resolution

All complaints shall be resolved within the timelines defined herein.

6.3 Confidentiality

Information shall be kept confidential and only shared with relevant parties or officials, or committees.

6.4 Impartiality

Decisions shall be made fairly, based on facts and due inquiry.

Section 7: Submission of Complaints

7.1 Mode of Submission

Complaints may be submitted through any of the following:

7.1.1 Google Form (official student complaint portal)

7.1.2 Manual submission to Registrar’s Office

7.1.3 Complaint Drop Box available at campus

7.2 Contents of the Complaint

Each complaint must contain:

(a) Student’s name, roll number, department, and program

(b) Nature and date of the grievance

(c) Full description with relevant facts

(d) Evidence, if available

(e) Category (from Section 3.1)

7.3 Anonymous Complaints

Anonymous complaints shall be entertained only if substantial evidence is provided.

Section 8: Processing and Timelines

8.1 Registration of Complaint

Upon receipt, the Registrar’s Office shall log the complaint within 1 working day.

8.2 Preliminary Screening

Within 2 working days, the complaint shall be reviewed to determine jurisdiction and completeness.

8.3 Assignment to Committee

If found valid, the complaint shall be forwarded to the Redressal Committee, Officer, or relevant department by Day 3.

8.4 Investigation and Recommendation

The Committee shall conduct an inquiry, including:

(a) Interviews with complainant and concerned stakeholders

(b) Review of academic records

(c) Expert opinion (if required)

8.5 Decision and Communication

Final decision shall be issued within 7 working days of submission.

A written response shall be provided to the student from the registrar's office.

Section 9: Redressal Committee Composition

9.1 The Committee shall consist of:

9.1.1 Chairperson – Registrar or Senior Faculty Member

9.1.2 One Faculty Member (nominated by Vice Chancellor)

9.1.3 Student Affairs Officer

9.1.4 Member from Quality Assurance / Legal Cell

9.1.5 Co-opted expert (optional, case-based)

OR

9.2 As per the University Act 2005

9.2.1 Discipline Committee (Schedule 13)

9.3 Conflict of Interest

Members with direct involvement in the complaint shall recuse themselves.

Section 10: Appeal Mechanism

10.1 Right to Appeal

If the student is dissatisfied, an appeal may be filed in writing within 5 working days to:

10.1.1 Vice Chancellor or a designated Appeal Committee

10.2 Finality of Decision

The decision of the Appeal Committee shall be final and binding.

Section 11: Disciplinary Action

11.1 If Complaint is Upheld

Faculty/Staff may face disciplinary action as per University Code of Conduct.

Student may receive redress (e.g., rechecking, new examiner, apology).

11.2 False or Malicious Complaints

If a complaint is found to be knowingly false:

11.2.1 The student may be subjected to disciplinary proceedings.

11.2.2 Penalties may include written warning or suspension.

Section 12: Record Keeping and Reporting

12.1 Confidential Records

All records shall be maintained by the Registrar’s Office for a period of three (3) years.

12.2 Quarterly Reporting

A quarterly report of complaints and resolutions shall be submitted to the Vice Chancellor and archived by QEC.

Section 13: Review and Amendments

13.1 Review Period

This policy shall be reviewed annually or earlier as deemed necessary.

13.2 Amendment Authority

The authority to amend this policy rests with the Vice Chancellor, upon recommendation of the Registrar.

Process Flow Diagram: (Student Complaint Redressal)

Students Submit Complaint Form
Complaint Received
& Logged
Assigned to Committee/ Officer/
Department
Investigation and Response
Response to Student
Complaint Closed
Escalation

Re-Open Complaint